Talk:Nomic:Game 2005-04-02:is rule 318 entirely void

From Carls wiki

I was very happy about the judgement, and all but ready to cast my yes vote on it, when I reached the last sentence: Also, the wording ... shall be altered ... or the sentence will be much harsher. Not only does this mix the issue of a deplorable but completely irrelevant spelling error into a judgement about the elegibility of non-bearded voters -- it is also in clear violation of r116. Please remove that last sentence, or I will vote no just to avoid trouble. — Carl 15:24, 10 Apr 2006 (CEST)

Jonas: Sorry, it was meant to be a comment on another side. Things was behaving very strange when I tried to submit the judgement, and I copy pasted it a dozen times and probably picked up something on the way. It definitely shouldn't be there. — Jonas 16:21, 10 Apr 2006 (CEST)

Ok, then I'm all for it. Please all players, never include a question mark in article names on this site. Question marks are treated separately by the wiki software, and they are the cause of Jonas' troubles. The urge to use a question mark is especially strong with judgements, of course. — Carl 16:28, 10 Apr 2006 (CEST)