Talk:Nomic:Game 2005-04-02:Rule Drafts

From Carls wiki

Johan:Isn't it a bit odd to use bold to indicate insertions in one place and use underlined text in another? — 09:53, 8 Jul 2005 (CEST)

Yes. Fixed. — Carl 10:50, 8 Jul 2005 (CEST)

Let me just point out, re draft 11: <ins> and <del> do not mean underline and strikethrough. They mean insertions and deletions, nothing else. They're semantic markup, and as such more or less free from representational concerns. Should such a rule pass, I as a webmaster would be prohibited from changing the CSS for an indefinite period. Thus I would vehemently fight against such a proposal. — Carl 10:50, 8 Jul 2005 (CEST)

Draft 11: amends should have only one m. In our current system, rule drafts are unchangeable, save for spelling corrections which should perhaps not be marked up with this system. wiki markup are two words. — Carl 10:50, 8 Jul 2005 (CEST)

Johan: Yes... — 11:41, 8 Jul 2005 (CEST)

Draft 14: This draft beats draft 7 in that it is not only useless for any practical purposes, but also downright dangerous for play. It would most probably invoke r213, giving the proposer an easy win. — Carl 14:38, 28 Jul 2005 (CEST)

Draft 19: Will it matter whether the players actually think about a strawberry, or lie about doing it? I think it will be difficult to tell the difference. — Carl 22:19, 7 Aug 2005 (CEST)

Johan: To overcome some of these problems, the other players can request to know which strawberry it was. If you believe that someone lies I think you could invoke Judgment. (10:55, 8 Aug 2005 (CEST))

Draft 21: I like this one. It would be a nice trick if somehow Nomic degenerated into an RPG session. :) — Carl 22:19, 7 Aug 2005 (CEST)